116
31st. Deo.
1909. Marked "E".
-21-
The imaginary friction is apparently due
to business letters sent to the Firm in the interests of the Government after great delay and when works were at a standstill pending receipt of drawings.
I would, however, say that friction is al- ways liable to occur when a Firm who are supposed to supply sccurate working drawings and reliable quantit- ies for a large fee (in this case $42,385.21) supply instead inaccurate drawings etc., thereby causing de- lays and necessitating fresh drawings or the amending of old ones to enable the work to be carried on.
I have always assisted the Firm as far as
possible but human nature has its limits even in Hong-
kong; indeed, the Architects had to withdraw, in
writing, to avoid further action on my part, their
baseless insinuations that I was in league with the
Contractors. (Copy of letter attached).
Clause 7.
(a) The Architects were consulted but no-
thing definite oould be obtained as will be noted on
perusal of page 5 of Mr. Jones' letter marked "C".
Clause 8.
(b) This refers to the method of keeping
accounts as instructed by Mr. Chatham. In connection
with this I have to state that when the works were
left in my hands to complete, there were only two
courses then open, viz:- To prepare the necessary
drawings to enable the work to proceed and so prevent
further delay; or to measure up the work and bring
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.